Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27806321›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

A network meta-analysis on the efficacy of sixteen targeted drugs in combination with chemotherapy for treatment of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer.

Dan-Zeng Ba-Sang, Zi-Wen Long, Hao Teng, Xu-Peng Zhao, Jian Qiu, Ming-Shan Li

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Biphasic Effects of bFGF Blockade on Lung Cancer Cell Invasion.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan-Zeng Ba-SangDepartment of Oncology, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, P. R. China.
Zi-Wen LongDepartment of Gastric Cancer and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Surgery, Fudan university Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Hao TengDepartment of Oncology, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, P. R. China.
Xu-Peng ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, P. R. China.
Jian QiuDepartment of Oncology, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, P. R. China.
Ming-Shan LiDepartment of Oncology, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA network meta-analysis was conducted comparing the short-term efficacies of 16 targeted drugs in combination with chemotherapy for treatment of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

resultsTwenty-seven RCTs were ultimately incorporated into this network meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, bevacizumab + chemotherapy, panitumumab + chemotherapy and conatumumab + chemotherapy had higher PR rate. Bevacizumab + chemotherapy, cetuximab + chemotherapy, panitumumab + chemotherapy, trebananib + chemotherapy and conatumumab + chemotherapy had higher ORR rate in comparison to chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, bevacizumab + chemotherapy had higher DCR rate than chemotherapy alone. The results of our cluster analysis showed that chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, conatumumab, ganitumab, or brivanib + cetuximab had better efficacies for the treatment of advanced/metastatic CRC in comparison to chemotherapy alone. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectronic databases were comprehensively searched for potential and related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Direct and indirect evidence were incorporated for evaluation of stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), disease control rate (DCR) and overall response ratio (ORR) by calculating odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

conclusionsThese results indicated that bevacizumab + chemotherapy, panitumumab + chemotherapy, conatumumab + chemotherapy and brivanib + cetuximab + chemotherapy may have better efficacies for the treatment of advanced/metastatic CRC.

Indexed as

AlanineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDrug TherapyHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPanitumumabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeTriazinesAlanineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabbrivanibCetuximabconatumumabganitumabPanitumumabTriazineschemotherapycolorectal cancernetwork meta-analysisrandomized controlled trialtargeted drug

Identifiers

PMID27806321
PMCPMC5356673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.