Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27806306›Full record

ArticleCell reports2016

In Vivo Interrogation of Spinal Mechanosensory Circuits.

Amelia J Christensen, Shrivats M Iyer, Amaury François, Saurabh Vyas, Charu Ramakrishnan, Sam Vesuna, Karl Deisseroth, Grégory Scherrer, Scott L Delp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A spinal substrate for modular control of natural behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spike rate inference from mouse spinal cord calcium imaging data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spinal neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-expressing neurons are a pharmacotherapeutic target for the alleviation of neuropathic pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amelia J ChristensenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shrivats M IyerDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Amaury FrançoisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Saurabh VyasDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Charu RamakrishnanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Sam VesunaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Karl DeisserothDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Grégory ScherrerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Stanford Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: gs25@stanford.edu.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: delp@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Optogenetic inhibition of motor neuron and muscle activity in vivoR01NS080954 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Analgesic Mechanism of Action of Endogenous Opioid Peptides Enkephalins with a FoR00DA031777 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHERRER, GREGORY · 2012 to 2014
$737k
Analgesic Mechanism of Action of Endogenous Opioid Peptides Enkephalins with a FoK99DA031777 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHERRER, GREGORY · 2011 to 2011
$161k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS K99 DA031777NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA031777NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal dorsal horn circuits receive, process, and transmit somatosensory information. To understand how specific components of these circuits contribute to behavior, it is critical to be able to directly modulate their activity in unanesthetized in vivo conditions. Here, we develop experimental tools that enable optogenetic control of spinal circuitry in freely moving mice using commonly available materials. We use these tools to examine mechanosensory processing in the spinal cord and observe that optogenetic activation of somatostatin-positive interneurons facilitates both mechanosensory and itch-related behavior, while reversible chemogenetic inhibition of these neurons suppresses mechanosensation. These results extend recent findings regarding the processing of mechanosensory information in the spinal cord and indicate the potential for activity-induced release of the somatostatin neuropeptide to affect processing of itch. The spinal implant approach we describe here is likely to enable a wide range of studies to elucidate spinal circuits underlying pain, touch, itch, and movement.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsFemaleHistamineInterneuronsLightMice, Inbred C57BLOptical FibersOptogeneticsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosPruritusSomatostatinSpinal CordHistamineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSomatostatinitchnociceptionoptogeneticssomatostatinspinal cordtouch

Identifiers

PMID27806306
PMCPMC5507199
OpenAlexW2547032004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.