Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27806284›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Measuring Cell Viscoelastic Properties Using a Microfluidic Extensional Flow Device.

Lionel Guillou, Joanna B Dahl, Jung-Ming G Lin, AbduI I Barakat, Julien Husson, Susan J Muller, Sanjay Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Active Force Dynamics in Red Blood Cells Under Non-Invasive Optical Tweezers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blood Particulate Analogue Fluids: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lionel GuillouHydrodynamics Laboratory, CNRS UMR7646, Department of Mechanics, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Joanna B DahlDepartment of Bioengineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Jung-Ming G LinDepartment of Bioengineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California; The UC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
AbduI I BarakatHydrodynamics Laboratory, CNRS UMR7646, Department of Mechanics, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Julien HussonHydrodynamics Laboratory, CNRS UMR7646, Department of Mechanics, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Susan J MullerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Bioengineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California; The UC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Electronic address: skumar@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of Neural Stem Cell MechanoregulationR01NS074831 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Sanjay Kumar, DAVID V SCHAFFER · 2012 to 2026
$5.9M
Stem Cell Engineering Training ProgramT32GM098218 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEALY, KEVIN EDWARD, SCHAFFER, DAVID V · 2011 to 2020
$1.8M
Molecular analysis of physical microenvironmental control of tumor cell invasionR21CA174573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2014 to 2016
$655k
Genetic strategies for the quantitative control of cell-matrix mechanobiologyR21EB016359 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2013 to 2014
$425k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA174573NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016359NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM098218NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantification of cellular mechanical properties is of tremendous interest in biology and medicine. Recent microfluidic technologies that infer cellular mechanical properties based on analysis of cellular deformations during microchannel traversal have dramatically improved throughput over traditional single-cell rheological tools, yet the extraction of material parameters from these measurements remains quite complex due to challenges such as confinement by channel walls and the domination of complex inertial forces. Here, we describe a simple microfluidic platform that uses hydrodynamic forces at low Reynolds number and low confinement to elongate single cells near the stagnation point of a planar extensional flow. In tandem, we present, to our knowledge, a novel analytical framework that enables determination of cellular viscoelastic properties (stiffness and fluidity) from these measurements. We validated our system and analysis by measuring the stiffness of cross-linked dextran microparticles, which yielded reasonable agreement with previously reported values and our micropipette aspiration measurements. We then measured viscoelastic properties of 3T3 fibroblasts and glioblastoma tumor initiating cells. Our system captures the expected changes in elastic modulus induced in 3T3 fibroblasts and tumor initiating cells in response to agents that soften (cytochalasin D) or stiffen (paraformaldehyde) the cytoskeleton. The simplicity of the device coupled with our analytical model allows straightforward measurement of the viscoelastic properties of cells and soft, spherical objects.

Indexed as

ElasticityLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell Line, TumorGlioblastomaMiceNIH 3T3 CellsViscosity

Identifiers

PMID27806284
PMCPMC5103028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.