Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27806108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Sex Differences in Long-Term Potentiation at Temporoammonic-CA1 Synapses: Potential Implications for Memory Consolidation.

Xiaoqiang Qi, Ke Zhang, Ting Xu, Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Zhisheng Wei, Mingfa Huang, Gregory M Rose, Xiang Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The how and why for multiple forms of hippocampal LTP.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New perspectives on sex differences in learning and memory.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Sex differences in synaptic plasticity underlying learning.Journal of neuroscience research · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoqiang QiDepartment of Physiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, United States of America.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Physiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, United States of America.
Ting XuThe Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Vitor Nagai YamakiDepartment of Physiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, United States of America.
Zhisheng WeiThe Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Mingfa HuangThe Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Gregory M RoseDepartment of Anatomy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, United States of America.
Xiang CaiDepartment of Physiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-553X
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · USSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in spatial memory have long been observed in humans, non-human primates and rodents, but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for these differences remain obscure. In the present study we found that adolescent male rats outperformed female rats in 7 d and 28 d retention probes, but not in learning trials and immediate probes, in the Morris water maze task. Male rats also had larger long-term potentiation (LTP) at hippocampal temproammonic-CA1 (TA-CA1) synapses, which have been implicated to play a key role in place field and memory consolidation, when protocols designed to elicit late-stage LTP (LLTP) were used. Interestingly, the ratio of evoked AMPA/NMDA currents was found to be smaller at TA-CA1 synapses in male rats compared to female rats. Protein biotinylation experiments showed that male rats expressed more surface GluN1 receptors in hippocampal CA1 stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) than female rats, although GluA1 expression was also slightly higher in male rats. Taken together, our results suggest that differences in the expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors may affect LTP expression at TA-CA1 synapses in adolescent male and female rats, and thus possibly contribute to the observed sex difference in spatial memory.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalFemaleMaleMaze LearningMemory ConsolidationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSex CharacteristicsReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID27806108
PMCPMC5091894
OpenAlexW2547901731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.