Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27805472›Full record

ArticleJournal of American college health : J of ACH

College students' perceptions of risk and addictiveness of e-cigarettes and cigarettes.

Maria Cooper, Alexandra Loukas, Melissa B Harrell, Cheryl L Perry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of American college health : J of ACH. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Differences in young adults' perceptions of e-cigarettes by history of use.Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Coopera University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , School of Public Health, Austin Regional Campus , Austin , Texas , USA.
Alexandra Loukasb Department of Kinesiology and Health Education , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas , USA.
Melissa B Harrella University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , School of Public Health, Austin Regional Campus , Austin , Texas , USA.
Cheryl L Perrya University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , School of Public Health, Austin Regional Campus , Austin , Texas , USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Training & Education Core p335-350P50CA180906 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PERRY, CHERYL LEE · 2013 to 2017
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs conventional cigarette use is declining, electronic cigarette ("e-cigarette") use is rising and is especially high among college students. Few studies examine dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes among this population. This study explores the relationship between dual and exclusive e-cigarette / cigarette use and perceptions of harm and addictiveness of both products.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional analysis of data from students attending 24 colleges in Texas (n=5,482). Multinomial logistic regression was employed to test the association between current e-cigarette / cigarette use and perceived harm and addictiveness of both products. Three tobacco groups were included: cigarette only users, e-cigarette only users, and dual users.

resultsDual users reported lower perceived harm of e-cigarettes most consistently (p<0.001, all comparisons). Perceived harm of cigarettes was significantly lower among cigarette only and dual users only, compared to non-users (p<0.001, all comparisons). Compared to non-users, all three groups reported significantly lower perceived addictiveness of e-cigarettes (p<0.001, all comparisons). The same finding was observed for perceived addictiveness of cigarettes, though findings were less consistent for the e-cigarette only group (p<0.02, all comparisons except one).

conclusionFindings demonstrate that among college students, perceptions of harm and addictiveness of e-cigarettes are lower than those for conventional cigarettes. For both products, perceptions of harm and addictiveness were lower among exclusive and dual users, compared to non-users.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRisk-TakingSmokingStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersTexasUniversitiesAlternative tobacco useelectronic cigarettestobacco useyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID27805472
PMCPMC5278646
OpenAlexW2548319184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.