Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27805045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

DPDR-CPI, a server that predicts Drug Positioning and Drug Repositioning via Chemical-Protein Interactome.

Heng Luo, Ping Zhang, Xi Hang Cao, Dizheng Du, Hao Ye, Hui Huang, Can Li, Shengying Qin, Chunling Wan, Leming Shi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Deep Subgrouping Framework for Precision Drug Repurposing via Emulating Clinical Trials on Real-world Patient Data.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent Advances in In Silico Target Fishing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Heng LuoBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Ping ZhangCenter for Computational Health, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA.
Xi Hang CaoCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Dizheng DuBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Hao YeBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Hui HuangBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Can LiBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Shengying QinBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Chunling WanBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Leming ShiCollaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Lin HeBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Lun YangBio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of developing a new drug has increased sharply over the past years. To ensure a reasonable return-on-investment, it is useful for drug discovery researchers in both industry and academia to identify all the possible indications for early pipeline molecules. For the first time, we propose the term computational "drug candidate positioning" or "drug positioning", to describe the above process. It is distinct from drug repositioning, which identifies new uses for existing drugs and maximizes their value. Since many therapeutic effects are mediated by unexpected drug-protein interactions, it is reasonable to analyze the chemical-protein interactome (CPI) profiles to predict indications. Here we introduce the server DPDR-CPI, which can make real-time predictions based only on the structure of the small molecule. When a user submits a molecule, the server will dock it across 611 human proteins, generating a CPI profile of features that can be used for predictions. It can suggest the likelihood of relevance of the input molecule towards ~1,000 human diseases with top predictions listed. DPDR-CPI achieved an overall AUROC of 0.78 during 10-fold cross-validations and AUROC of 0.76 for the independent validation. The server is freely accessible via http://cpi.bio-x.cn/dpdr/.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningUser-Computer InterfaceArea Under CurveHumansInternetMolecular Docking SimulationPharmaceutical PreparationsProtein BindingProteinsPyridazinesROC CurveRosiglitazoneThiazolidinediones4-bromo-6-(3-(4-chlorophenyl)propoxy)-5-(3-pyridylmethylamino)-3(2H)-pyridazinone hydrochloridePharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsPyridazinesRosiglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID27805045
PMCPMC5090963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.