Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27804074›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off values using gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Guillermo Romero-Farina, Jaume Candell-Riera, María N Pizzi, David García-Dorado

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The feasibility ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  2. Mechanical dyssynchrony: How do we measure it, what it means, and what we can do about it.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Perspective and future direction of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony assessment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Feasible Classified Models for Parkinson Disease fromSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  5. Mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off values using gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santiago Aguadé-BruixDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Paseo Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. saguade@vhebron.net.
Guillermo Romero-FarinaCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume Candell-RieraCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María N PizziCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
David García-DoradoCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to establish different degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off (CO) values of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT phase analysis parameters (SD, standard deviation; B, bandwidth; S, skewness; K, kurtosis).

methodsUsing Emory Cardiac Toolbox™, we prospectively analyzed 408 patients (mean age 64.1 years, 26.7% female), divided into a control group of 150 normal subjects and a validation group of 258 patients (left bundle branch block: 17.8%, right bundle branch block: 8.9%. atrial fibrillation: 16.3%, coronary revascularization: 30%, dilated cardiomyopathy: 7.4%. valvulopathies: 2.7%, ischemic test: 45.3%) with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases, by means of phase analysis.

resultsAgreement of CO values (SD > 18.4°; B > 51°; S ≤ 3.2; K ≤ 9.3) used to discriminate between normal subjects and patients was strong (c-statistic 0.9; 95% CI 0.98-0.99). Four degrees of dyssynchrony were found according to the number of abnormal phase parameters. All patients with mechanical and electrical criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CCRT) (n: 82) had Grade 2 to 4 (two to four abnormal phase parameters). Agreement of CO values (SD > 40.2°; B > 132°; S ≤ 2.3; K ≤ 4.6) used to discriminate between patients with and without CCRT was strong (c-statistic 0.8; 95% CI 0.79-0.87) but 12% of patients with CCRT did not have any of these abnormal phase parameters.

conclusionsThe discriminatory capacity of gated SPECT phase analysis parameters between normal subjects and patients, and between patients with and without CCRT, is very good, making it possible to define different degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedArrhythmias, CardiacCardiomyopathy, DilatedCoronary DiseaseFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitycardiac resynchronization therapydyssynchronyGated SPECT myocardial perfusionphase analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.