Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27804072›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Long-term prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scanning, coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Carmela Nappi, Emanuele Nicolai, Stefania Daniele, Wanda Acampa, Valeria Gaudieri, Roberta Assante, Emilia Zampella, Sabrina Segreto, Massimo Imbriaco, Mario Petretta and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combined evaluation of CAC score and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: where are we and what do the data say.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT cameras: A journey inside coronary microvascular circulation. Is it time to leave yet?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. The addition of coronary artery calcium to myocardial perfusion: Double or nothing?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Prediction of outcome byJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review.RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2022
    Review
  11. ASNC's thoughts on the AHA/ACC chest pain guidelines.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. The often-overlooked elements of #PatientFirst imaging: Focus on optimal quality, including up-to-date protocols and equipment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Computed tomography calls out nuclear imaging in its field: It doesn't matter how you are searching but what you are looking for.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Relationship between coronary artery calcification and myocardial ischemia on computed tomography myocardial perfusion in patients with stable chest pain.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  16. ASNC stands for #PatientFirst imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  19. The machine learning approach: Artificial intelligence is coming to support critical clinical thinking.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Coronary vascular age: An alternate means for predicting stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carmela NappiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Emanuele NicolaiIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Stefania DanieleInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.
Wanda AcampaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Valeria GaudieriInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.
Roberta AssanteDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Emilia ZampellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Sabrina SegretoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Massimo ImbriacoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Mario PetrettaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Alberto CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. cuocolo@unina.it.
Federico II University Hospital · ITInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe compared the long-term prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning, coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), and stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND

resultsA total of 164 patients were studied. CAC score was measured according to the Agatston method and patients were categorized into 3 groups (0, 1-300, and >300). The following events were recorded: cardiac death, nonfatal infarction, and unstable angina requiring revascularization. Follow-up was 95% complete during a mean period of 82 ± 34 months. During follow-up, 22 events occurred (14% cumulative event rate). Event-free survival decreased with worsening of CAC score category (P < .001) and it was worse (P < .001) in patients with significant CAD (≥50% stenosis) and in those with stress-induced ischemia (summed difference score >2). At multivariable analysis, CAC (P = .001) and ischemia (P = .012) were independent predictors of events. MPI data added prognostic information to a model including clinical variables, CAC and CCTA findings, increasing the global Chi-square from 36.2 to 41.9 (P = .013). The decision curve analyses in patients with CAC score >0 indicate that the prognostic model including MPI resulted in a higher net benefit across a wide range of decision threshold probabilities.

conclusionsCAC and MPI, but not CCTA, are independent predictors of cardiac events. Stress MPI appears to improve risk stratification over clinical variables, CAC scanning and CCTA findings.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisTime FactorsVascular CalcificationCoronary artery calciumcoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomographic angiographymyocardial perfusion imagingprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27804072
OpenAlexW2548942357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.