Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27804030›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Literacy and Awareness, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening in Riyadh Region.

Khalid M Almutairi, Wadi B Alonazi, Abdulaziz Alodhayani, Jason M Vinluan, Mohammad Ahmad, Sultana Abdulaziz Alhurishi, Nourah Alsadhan, Majed Mohammed Alsalem, Nader Eqaab Alotaibi, Alaa Mustafa Alaqeel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khalid M AlmutairiDepartment of Community Health Science, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box: 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia. kalmutairim@ksu.edu.sa.
Wadi B AlonaziCollege of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlodhayaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jason M VinluanDepartment of Community Health Science, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box: 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AhmadCollege of Nursing Saudi Arabia, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultana Abdulaziz AlhurishiCommunity Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nourah AlsadhanCommunity Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed Mohammed AlsalemSecurity Forces Hospital, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nader Eqaab AlotaibiCollege of Nursing Saudi Arabia, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa Mustafa AlaqeelCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to explore the association between functional health literacy and awareness for, beliefs, and attitudes of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening test in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 256 participants from two different tertiary level hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were recruited in this study. The participants were interviewed by a trained researcher between October and December 2015. All respondents answered a three-part questionnaire which included demographic data, questions related to CRC awareness, attitude, behaviour, and short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOFHLA). More than half of the participants had an inadequate awareness of functional health literacy skills (FHLS), 16.4 % had marginal of FHLS awareness and 17.6 % had adequate awareness about FHLS as assessed by the STOFHLA. Overall, the majority of the participants in both marginal and adequate aware groups showed a limited awareness about colorectal cancer screening and testing. A significant association was found on awareness of the patients about frequencies that they should have been tested for colorectal cancer and functional health literacy. No significant association was found between functional health literacy as assessed by STOFHLA and concerns of Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) (p = 0.384) and sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy might cause embarrassment (p = 0.089), harm (p = 0.917), and pain (p = 0.849). The present study revealed a low level of health literacy among Saudi adults in Riyadh region. Although the level of literacy was low, the bigger concern is that of the poor awareness and beliefs of Saudi adults about CRC and CRC screening.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeBehaviourCancer screeningColorectal cancerLiteracySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID27804030
OpenAlexW2547350898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.