Trial reportHeart and vessels2017
Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02455661 (Femoral Closure Versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Femoral Closure Versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare prospectively the differences of clinical outcomes being associated with a specific femoral closure (FC) compared to a radial compression (RC) device following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This single-center, prospective observational study included consecutively 400 patients either treated by a specific FC (Angio-Seal™, St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN) or RC (TR Band TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02455661 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.