ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2016
Novel
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutation Screening ofGenes · 2026Article
- Genotype-phenotype correlations in Chinese patients with congenital stationary night blindness and early-onset high myopia: evidence from electrophysiology and whole-exome sequencing.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Temporal Regulation of Myopia and Inflammation-Associated Pathways in the Interphotoreceptor Retinoid-Binding Protein Knockout Mouse Model.Current eye research · 2025Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing of 21 Families: Candidate Genes for Early-Onset High Myopia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- TRP channels in health and disease at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2021Article
- Presentation of TRPM1-Associated Congenital Stationary Night Blindness in Children.JAMA ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the relationship between high myopia [with or without complete congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB1)] and
methodsTwo unrelated families with early-onset high myopia (eoHM) and 96 normal controls were recruited. Sanger sequencing or clone sequencing were used for mutation screening. Further analyses of the available family members and the 96 normal controls were subsequently conducted to obtain additional evidence of the pathogenicity of these variants. The initial diagnosis of the probands was eoHM. We performed a further comprehensive examination of the available family members after mutations were detected in
resultsTwo novel compound heterozygous mutations in
conclusionThis study has expanded the mutation spectrum of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.