Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27803805›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2016

Nutrition in critical illness: a current conundrum.

L John Hoffer, Bruce R Bistrian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06564168 (Nutritional Status of Critically Ill Diabetic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06564168 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Nutritional Status of Critically Ill Diabetic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled430ConditionsNutrition, Critical Illness, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of enteral prucaloprideFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L John HofferLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bruce R BistrianBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill people are unable to eat. What's the best way to feed them? Nutrition authorities have long recommended providing generous amounts of protein and calories to critically ill patients, either intravenously or through feeding tubes, in order to counteract the catabolic state associated with this condition. In practice, however, patients in modern intensive care units are substantially underfed. Several large randomized clinical trials were recently carried out to determine the clinical implications of this situation. Contradicting decades of physiological, clinical, and observational data, the results of these trials have been claimed to justify the current practice of systematic underfeeding in the intensive care unit. This article explains and suggests how to resolve this conundrum.

Indexed as

cataboliccrtically illenteral nutritionICU nutritionparenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID27803805
PMCPMC5070594
OpenAlexW2538959242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.