Articlei-Perception
The Time-Course of Ultrarapid Categorization: The Influence of Scene Congruency and Top-Down Processing.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scene inversion impairs activation of scene-object semantic bias.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Neural representations of visual categories are dynamically tailored to the discrimination required by the task.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Multisensory perception constrains the formation of object categories: a review of evidence from sensory-driven and predictive processes on categorical decisions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Flexibility of emerging face categorization at different levels of abstraction.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- A Recurrent Temporal Model for Semantic Levels Categorization Based on Human Visual System.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
- How Native Background Affects Human Performance in Real-World Visual Object Detection: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Review
- The influence of spatial frequency content on facial expression processing: An ERP study using rapid serial visual presentation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Object Categorization in Finer Levels Relies More on Higher Spatial Frequencies and Takes Longer.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although categorization can take place at different levels of abstraction, classic studies on semantic labeling identified the basic level, for example, dog, as entry point for categorization. Ultrarapid categorization tasks have contradicted these findings, indicating that participants are faster at detecting superordinate-level information, for example, animal, in a complex visual image. We argue that both seemingly contradictive findings can be reconciled within the framework of parallel distributed processing and its successor Leabra (Local, Error-driven and Associative, Biologically Realistic Algorithm). The current study aimed at verifying this prediction in an ultrarapid categorization task with a dynamically changing presentation time (PT) for each briefly presented object, followed by a perceptual mask. Furthermore, we manipulated two defining task variables: level of categorization (basic vs. superordinate categorization) and object presentation mode (object-in-isolation vs. object-in-context). In contradiction with previous ultrarapid categorization research, focusing on reaction time, we used accuracy as our main dependent variable. Results indicated a consistent superordinate processing advantage, coinciding with an overall improvement in performance with longer PT and a significantly more accurate detection of objects in isolation, compared with objects in context, at lower stimulus PT. This contextual disadvantage disappeared when PT increased, indicating that figure-ground separation with recurrent processing is vital for meaningful contextual processing to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.