ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2016
Association between basal-like phenotype and
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of the HER2 status in BRCA-mutated breast cancer: a single institutional series and systematic review with pooled analysis.ESMO open · 2022Pooled it
- Breast cancer clustering integrating complete gene expression profiles and genetic ancestry.PloS one · 2026Article
- Correlation between BRCA1 expression and the advanced stage of triple‑negative breast cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular stratification within triple-negative breast cancer subtypes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A systematic review of the international prevalence ofClinical epidemiology · 2019Review
- Characterization ofF1000Research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
methodsIn a retrospective review of 498 breast cancer patients who had undergone
resultsAmong the 411 patients eligible for the study, 50 (12.2%) had germline mutations in
conclusionsIn the present study, tnbc was the only independent predictor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.