ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2016
Isotropic periodic sum for multipole interactions and a vector relation for calculation of the Cartesian multipole tensor.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- DEGAUSS: A Novel Softcore Force Field Using Double Exponential van der Waals and Gaussian Charge for Molecular Dynamics Simulations I: Theory and Validation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Non-Ewald methods for evaluating the electrostatic interactions of charge systems: similarity and difference.Biophysical reviews · 2022Review
- The homogeneity condition: A simple way to derive isotropic periodic sum potentials for efficient calculation of long-range interactions in molecular simulation.The Journal of chemical physics · 2019Article
- Polarizable Force Fields for Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Advances and Applications.Annual review of biophysics · 2019Review
- A fast and accurate computational method for the linear-combination-based isotropic periodic sum.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Critical test of isotropic periodic sum techniques with group-based cut-off schemes.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isotropic periodic sum (IPS) is a method to calculate long-range interactions based on the homogeneity of simulation systems. By using the isotropic periodic images of a local region to represent remote structures, long-range interactions become a function of the local conformation. This function is called the IPS potential; it folds long-ranged interactions into a short-ranged potential and can be calculated as efficiently as a cutoff method. It has been demonstrated that the IPS method produces consistent simulation results, including free energies, as the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method. By introducing the multipole homogeneous background approximation, this work derives multipole IPS potentials, abbreviated as IPSMm, with m being the maximum order of multipole interactions. To efficiently calculate the multipole interactions in Cartesian space, we propose a vector relation that calculates a multipole tensor as a dot product of a radial potential vector and a directional vector. Using model systems with charges, dipoles, and/or quadrupoles, with and without polarizability, we demonstrate that multipole interactions of order m can be described accurately with the multipole IPS potential of order 2 or m - 1, whichever is higher. Through simulations with the multipole IPS potentials, we examined energetic, structural, and dynamic properties of the model systems and demonstrated that the multipole IPS potentials produce very similar results as PME with a local region radius (cutoff distance) as small as 6 Å.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.