Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27802576›Full record

ArticleProteins2017

Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.

Xianjin Xu, Liming Qiu, Chengfei Yan, Zhiwei Ma, Sam Z Grinter, Xiaoqin Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Methods and Applications of In Silico Aptamer Design and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xianjin XuDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Liming QiuDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Chengfei YanDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Zhiwei MaDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Sam Z GrinterDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Xiaoqin ZouDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Database and software development for protein-nucleic acid structure predicationR01GM109980 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ZOU, XIAOQIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are either through direct contacts between two binding partners or mediated by structural waters. Both direct contacts and water-mediated interactions are crucial to the formation of a protein-protein complex. During the recent CAPRI rounds, a novel parallel searching strategy for predicting water-mediated interactions is introduced into our protein-protein docking method, MDockPP. Briefly, a FFT-based docking algorithm is employed in generating putative binding modes, and an iteratively derived statistical potential-based scoring function, ITScorePP, in conjunction with biological information is used to assess and rank the binding modes. Up to 10 binding modes are selected as the initial protein-protein complex structures for MD simulations in explicit solvent. Water molecules near the interface are clustered based on the snapshots extracted from independent equilibrated trajectories. Then, protein-ligand docking is employed for a parallel search for water molecules near the protein-protein interface. The water molecules generated by ligand docking and the clustered water molecules generated by MD simulations are merged, referred to as the predicted structural water molecules. Here, we report the performance of this protocol for CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 containing 20 valid docking targets and 11 scoring targets. In the docking experiments, we predicted correct binding modes for nine targets, including one high-accuracy, two medium-accuracy, and six acceptable predictions. Regarding the two targets for the prediction of water-mediated interactions, we achieved models ranked as "excellent" in accordance with the CAPRI evaluation criteria; one of these two targets is considered as a difficult target for structural water prediction. Proteins 2017; 85:424-434. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBenchmarkingBinding SitesComputational BiologyMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationProteinsResearch DesignSoftwareStructural Homology, ProteinThermodynamicsWaterProteinsWatermolecular dockingmolecular dynamics simulations. scoring functionprotein-protein interactionswater-mediated interactions

Identifiers

PMID27802576
PMCPMC5313341
OpenAlexW2557299360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.