ArticleProteins2017
Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: Lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1.
Article in Proteins, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Modeling in the Age of Machine Learning: A Summary of HADDOCK Strategies in CAPRI Rounds 47-55.Proteins · 2026Article
- COMPASS: A Computational Pipeline to Identify Linkers Predicting Ubiquitinable PROTAC-Induced Ternary Complexes.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Sequence optimization of a DNA aptamer inhibiting COVID-19 infection guided by analysis of secondary structure distribution.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Antibody Affinity Maturation by Computational Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Role of the DPP4 Receptor in SARS-CoV Entry: Insights From Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Proteins · 2025Article
- Class 1 Sugar Beet Phytoglobin Shows Strong Affinity to Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and DNA In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A new age in structural S-layer biology: Experimental and in silico milestones.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Review
- The Allosteric Inhibitor Pentachloropseudilin Inhibits Myosin 1C ATPase Activity and Recapitulates Retinitis Pigmentosa Phenotypes in Mice.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Breaking the 'don't eat me' signal: in silico design of CD47-directed peptides for cancer immunotherapy.Molecular diversity · 2024Article
- Towards the accurate modelling of antibody-antigen complexes from sequence using machine learning and information-driven docking.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Unveiling the structure and interactions of SOG1, a NAC domain transcription factor: An in-silico perspective.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Article
- ARCTIC-3D: automatic retrieval and clustering of interfaces in complexes from 3D structural information.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Predictive Modeling and Structure Analysis of Genetic Variants in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Implications for Diagnosis and Protein Interaction Studies.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- A Structural Model for the Core Nup358-BicD2 Interface.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Unveiling the functional epitopes of cobra venom cytotoxin by immunoinformatics and epitope-omic analyses.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Induced fit with replica exchange improves protein complex structure prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Domain architecture and catalysis of the Staphylococcus aureus fatty acid kinase.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- How Far Are We from the Rapid Prediction of Drug Resistance Arising Due to Kinase Mutations?ACS omega · 2021Article
- Computational Methods for the Elucidation of Protein Structure and Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK is a consistent top predictor and scorer since the start of its participation in the CAPRI community-wide experiment. This sustained performance is due, in part, to its ability to integrate experimental data and/or bioinformatics information into the modelling process, and also to the overall robustness of the scoring function used to assess and rank the predictions. In the CASP-CAPRI Round 1 scoring experiment we successfully selected acceptable/medium quality models for 18/14 of the 25 targets - a top-ranking performance among all scorers. Considering that for only 20 targets acceptable models were generated by the community, our effective success rate reaches as high as 90% (18/20). This was achieved using the standard HADDOCK scoring function, which, thirteen years after its original publication, still consists of a simple linear combination of intermolecular van der Waals and Coulomb electrostatics energies and an empirically derived desolvation energy term. Despite its simplicity, this scoring function makes sense from a physico-chemical perspective, encoding key aspects of biomolecular recognition. In addition to its success in the scoring experiment, the HADDOCK server takes the first place in the server prediction category, with 16 successful predictions. Much like our scoring protocol, because of the limited time per target, the predictions relied mainly on either an ab initio center-of-mass and symmetry restrained protocol, or on a template-based approach whenever applicable. These results underline the success of our simple but sensible prediction and scoring scheme. Proteins 2017; 85:417-423. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.