Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27802314›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Detection, Prevalence and Phylogenetic Relationships of Demodex spp and further Skin Prostigmata Mites (Acari, Arachnida) in Wild and Domestic Mammals.

Natalia Sastre, Olga Francino, Joseph N Curti, Tiffany C Armenta, Devaughn L Fraser, Rochelle M Kelly, Erin Hunt, Katja Silbermayr, Christine Zewe, Armand Sánchez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First Detection of Human- and Dog-AssociatedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. FatalJournal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  4. Detection and Eradication of aJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2024
    Article
  5. A new species ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection ofJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of Diagnostic Methods and Sampling Sites for the Detection of Demodex musculi.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization ofComparative medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalia SastreDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Olga FrancinoServei Veterinari de Genètica Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Joseph N CurtiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Tiffany C ArmentaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Devaughn L FraserDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rochelle M KellyDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Erin HuntCalifornia Wolf Center, Julian, California, United States of America.
Katja SilbermayrDepartment of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine ZeweDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Armand SánchezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Lluís FerrerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of California, Los Angeles · USTufts University · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conceived to detect skin mites in social mammals through real-time qPCR, and to estimate taxonomic Demodex and further Prostigmata mite relationships in different host species by comparing sequences from two genes: mitochondrial 16S rRNA and nuclear 18S rRNA. We determined the mite prevalence in the hair follicles of marmots (13%) and bats (17%). The high prevalence found in marmots and bats by sampling only one site on the body may indicate that mites are common inhabitants of their skin. Since we found three different mites (Neuchelacheles sp, Myobia sp and Penthaleus sp) in three bat species (Miotis yumanensis, Miotis californicus and Corynorhinus townsendii) and two different mites (both inferred to be members of the Prostigmata order) in one marmot species (Marmota flaviventris), we tentatively concluded that these skin mites 1) cannot be assigned to the same genus based only on a common host, and 2) seem to evolve according to the specific habitat and/or specific hair and sebaceous gland of the mammalian host. Moreover, two M. yumanensis bats harbored identical Neuchelacheles mites, indicating the possibility of interspecific cross-infection within a colony. However, some skin mites species are less restricted by host species than previously thought. Specifically, Demodex canis seems to be more transmissible across species than other skin mites. D. canis have been found mostly in dogs but also in cats and captive bats. In addition, we report the first case of D. canis infestation in a domestic ferret (Mustela putorius). All these mammalian hosts are related to human activities, and D. canis evolution may be a consequence of this relationship. The monophyletic Demodex clade showing closely related dog and human Demodex sequences also supports this likely hypothesis.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsAnimals, WildCell NucleusDogsGenetic VariationHumansMitesMitochondriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSkinRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID27802314
PMCPMC5089713
OpenAlexW2547261419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.