Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27802186›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi Gong, Qingming Wang, Li Dong, Yiping Jia, Chengge Hua, Fanglin Mi, Chunjie Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Single-photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion caused by oral cancers: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yi GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Qingming WangDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Li DongDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu Zhou, Sichuan, China.
Yiping JiaDepartment of Ultrasound, No.4 West China Teaching Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chengge HuaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Evidence-based Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fanglin MiDepartment of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Chunjie LiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Evidence-based Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oral DiseasesAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNAffiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different imaging techniques and the corresponding diagnostic criteria for preoperative detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis from gynecological carcinomas.

methodsSix databases were systematically searched for retrieving eligible studies. Study inclusion, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by 2 reviewers independently. STATA 14.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis.

resultsEighty eligible studies were collected. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) of CT, MRI and DWI were 47%, 93%, 0.7424; 50%, 95%, 0.8039 and 84%, 95%, 0.9523 respectively. As regards PET, PET-CT and US, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 56%, 97%, 0.9592; 68%, 97%, 0.9363 and 71%, 99%, 0.9008 respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve indicated that the systematic diagnostic performances of PET, PET-CT, DWI were superior to other imaging modalities.

conclusionsThe present work demonstrated that DWI, PET, PET-CT were the top-priority consideration of imaging modalities for detecting metastatic pelvic lymph node in gynecological carcinoma. DWI was recommended as the first choice for metastasis exclusion and all the other imaging techniques including CT and MRI were suitable for metastasis conformation. However, for the early stage lymph node malignancy, PET or PET-CT could represent a better choice. More studies exploring the diagnostic efficacy of detailed criteria are required in the future.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveDiagnostic ImagingFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisPelvisROC CurveSensitivity and Specificitygynecological malignanceimaging techniquemetastasispelvic lymph nodesystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27802186
PMCPMC5355166
OpenAlexW2543598684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.