Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27801961›Full record

Observational studyCancer science2017

Heterogeneous impact of alcohol consumption according to treatment method on survival in head and neck cancer: A prospective study.

Michi Sawabe, Hidemi Ito, Isao Oze, Satoyo Hosono, Daisuke Kawakita, Hideo Tanaka, Yasuhisa Hasegawa, Shingo Murakami, Keitaro Matsuo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MicroRNA-Related Genetic Variants Associated with Survival of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michi SawabeDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Hidemi ItoDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Isao OzeDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoyo HosonoDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Daisuke KawakitaDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideo TanakaDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhisa HasegawaDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shingo MurakamiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Keitaro MatsuoDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1761-6314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol consumption is an established risk factor, and also a potential prognostic factor, for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). However, little is known about whether the prognostic impact of alcohol consumption differs by treatment method. We evaluated the association between alcohol drinking and survival by treatment method to the primary site in 427 patients with HNSCC treated between 2005 and 2013 at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital (Nagoya, Japan). The impact of alcohol on prognosis was measured by multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for established prognostic factors. Among all HNSCC patients, the overall survival rate was significantly poorer with increased levels of alcohol consumption in multivariable analysis (trend P = 0.038). Stratification by treatment method and primary site revealed that the impact of drinking was heterogeneous. Among laryngopharyngeal cancer (laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer) patients receiving radiotherapy (n = 141), a significant dose-response relationship was observed (trend P = 0.034). In contrast, among laryngopharyngeal cancer patients treated with surgery (n = 80), no obvious impact of alcohol was observed. This heterogeneity in the impact of alcohol between surgery and radiotherapy was significant (for interaction, P = 0.048). Furthermore, among patients with oral cavity cancer treated by surgery, a significant impact of drinking on survival was seen with tongue cancer, but not with non-tongue oral cancer. We observed a significant inverse association between alcohol drinking and prognosis among HNSCC patients, and its impact was heterogeneous by treatment method and primary site.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingCarcinoma, Squamous CellConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLaryngeal NeoplasmsLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedPharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesSmokingTreatment OutcomeAdverse effectalcoholhead and neck cancerprognostic factortreatment

Identifiers

PMID27801961
PMCPMC5276823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.