Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27801878›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Air Pollution Exposure in Relation to the Commute to School: A Bradford UK Case Study.

Kim N Dirks, Judith Y T Wang, Amirul Khan, Christopher Rushton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Parents' and Teachers' Perceptions of Risks Associated with Children's Walks to School in Blantyre, Malawi.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Effect of Route Choice in Children's Exposure to Ultrafine Particles Whilst Walking to School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim N DirksFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. k.dirks@auckland.ac.nz.
Judith Y T WangSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. j.y.t.wang@leeds.ac.uk.
Amirul KhanSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. a.khan@leeds.ac.uk.
Christopher RushtonInstitute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. phy4cer@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking School Buses (WSBs) provide a safe alternative to being driven to school. Children benefit from the contribution the exercise provides towards their daily exercise target, it gives children practical experience with respect to road safety and it helps to relieve traffic congestion around the entrance to their school. Walking routes are designed largely based in road safety considerations, catchment need and the availability of parent support. However, little attention is given to the air pollution exposure experienced by children during their journey to school, despite the commuting microenvironment being an important contributor to a child's daily air pollution exposure. This study aims to quantify the air pollution exposure experienced by children walking to school and those being driven by car. A school was chosen in Bradford, UK. Three adult participants carried out the journey to and from school, each carrying a P-Trak ultrafine particle (UFP) count monitor. One participant travelled the journey to school by car while the other two walked, each on opposite sides of the road for the majority of the journey. Data collection was carried out over a period of two weeks, for a total of five journeys to school in the morning and five on the way home at the end of the school day. Results of the study suggest that car commuters experience lower levels of air pollution dose due to lower exposure and reduced commute times. The largest reductions in exposure for pedestrians can be achieved by avoiding close proximity to traffic queuing up at intersections, and, where possible, walking on the side of the road opposite the traffic, especially during the morning commuting period. Major intersections should also be avoided as they were associated with peak exposures. Steps to ensure that the phasing of lights is optimised to minimise pedestrian waiting time would also help reduce exposure. If possible, busy roads should be avoided altogether. By the careful design of WSB routes, taking into account air pollution, children will be able to experience the benefits that walking to school brings while minimizing their air pollution exposure during their commute to and from school.

Indexed as

CitiesSchoolsWalkingAir PollutantsAir PollutionChildHumansInhalation ExposureMotor VehiclesParticulate MatterUnited KingdomVehicle EmissionsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterVehicle Emissionschildrenexposurepedestrianschooltrafficultrafine particles

Identifiers

PMID27801878
PMCPMC5129274
OpenAlexW2544943196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.