ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2017
Neurocognitive Function and Suicide in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive effort avoidance in veterans with suicide attempt histories.Acta psychologica · 2022Article
- Association between neurocognitive functioning and suicide attempts in U.S. Army Soldiers.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Article
- Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide death among Veterans and service members: A comprehensive meta-analysis of risk factors.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022Article
- Neurocognition and the Suicidal Process.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2020Article
- Neurocognitive functioning in community youth with suicidal ideation: gender and pubertal effects.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2019Article
- Overlapping genetic effects between suicidal ideation and neurocognitive functioning.Journal of affective disorders · 2019Article
- The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers.Molecular psychiatry · 2019Review
- Associations of suicidality with cognitive ability and cognitive insight in outpatients with Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective cohort study used administrative data from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers to examine associations between neurocognitive functioning and subsequent suicidal events among Regular Army enlisted soldiers during the years 2004-2009. Cases were all soldiers who completed the Army's Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) computerized testing battery prior to documented suicide attempt (n = 607), ideation (n = 955), or death (n = 57). Controls were an equal-probability sample of 9,893 person-months from other soldiers. Exploratory factor analysis of five ANAM tests identified a general neurocognitive factor that excluded the mathematic processing test (MTH). When examined separately in logistic regression analyses that controlled for sociodemographics and prior mental health diagnosis, both the general neurocognitive factor (logit [β] = -.197 to -.521; p < .01) and MTH (β = -.024 to -.064; p < .05) were associated with all outcomes. When both predictors were examined simultaneously, the general neurocognitive factor continued to be associated with all outcomes (β = -.164 to -.417; p < .05) and MTH continued to be associated with suicide attempt (β = -.015; p = .046) and ideation (β = -.014; p = .018). These small but robust associations suggest that future research must continue to examine the extent to which objective neurocognitive tests may enhance understanding and prediction of suicide risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.