Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27800636›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

Diagnostic value of autoantibodies combined detection for rheumatoid arthritis.

Pingping Sun, Wanhai Wang, Ling Chen, Nan Li, Xianchun Meng, Jing Bian, Jingjing Yang, Xu'na Wang, Weitao Zhu, Liang Ming

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pingping SunLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Wanhai WangLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Ling ChenLaboratory of Jiangyou People's Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Nan LiLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Xianchun MengLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Jing BianLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Jingjing YangLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Xu'na WangLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Weitao ZhuLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Liang MingLaboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory and autoimmune disease, there are many autoantibodies produced during disease progression in the patients' serum, and this work is to select a best detection scheme for RA diagnosis.

methodsAutoantibody levels including rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV), anti-keratin antibodies(AKA), anti-perinuclear factor (APF), and Ig heavy chain binding protein (BIP), were measured, and the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and Youden's index of different combining forms were all calculated in RA patients, disease, and healthy control group. The differences in the positive rates of the three groups were compared between any two of them.

resultsGenerally speaking, the sensitivity of the autoantibodies detected in parallel combination was higher than that in tandem, which was more specific. The sensitivity of anti-MCV and RF calculated in parallel (87.61%) was obviously better than that of anyone autoantibody (P<.05), and only increased slightly even if more autoantibodies were tested in parallel (P>.05). The specificity of anti-CCP and BIP measured in tandem (95.92%) was obviously higher than that of anyone autoantibody (P<.05). While increasing the detected number of autoantibody from two kinds to three or more, the specificity was improved insignificantly (P>.05).

conclusionAnti-BIP and CCP antibodies detected in tandem combination can obtain higher specificity, and have good clinical value for the differential diagnosis of RA.

Indexed as

AdultArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesBiomarkersanti-cyclic citrullinated peptidebinding proteinmutated citrullinated vimentinrheumatoid arthritisrheumatoid factor

Identifiers

PMID27800636
PMCPMC6816999
OpenAlexW2548136998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.