ArticleFEBS letters2016
Simultaneous generation of multi-gene knockouts in human cells.
Article in FEBS letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered circular ADAR-recruiting RNAs increase the efficiency and fidelity of RNA editing in vitro and in vivo.Nature biotechnology · 2022Article
- Programmable RNA editing by recruiting endogenous ADAR using engineered RNAs.Nature biotechnology · 2019Article
- Homology-independent multiallelic disruption via CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in yields distinct functional outcomes in human cells.BMC biology · 2018Article
- A surrogate reporter system for multiplexable evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9 in targeted mutagenesis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Dominant negative effect of the loss-of-function γ-secretase mutants on the wild-type enzyme through heterooligomerization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-editing techniques enable the generation of gene knockouts in various mammalian cell lines. However, it remains technically challenging to completely disrupt a targeted gene using a canonical method in a timely manner. To improve the efficiency of producing reliable genomic modifications, we designed a method using a linear donor fragment containing a reporter system. Combined with a homologous recombination-independent knock-in strategy, we successfully enriched those cell clones that specifically carry the target gene mutations. We observed a much improved success rate when generating single- and multiple-gene knockouts in a one-step procedure using this special protocol coupled with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. This new approach further empowers the molecular biological study of genes and their functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.