ArticleItalian journal of food safety2016
Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Genomics and Phenotypic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Functional Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Isolation, Characterization, and Optimization of Antimicrobial Proteinaceous Compounds Produced byInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- A Meta-Analysis on the In Vitro Antagonistic Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Dairy Products on Foodborne Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of inhibitory and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from vaginal microflora.Folia microbiologica · 2022Article
- The Age of Next-Generation Therapeutic-Microbe Discovery: Exploiting Microbe-Microbe and Host-Microbe Interactions for Disease Prevention.Infection and immunity · 2022Review
- Composition, Succession, and Source Tracking of Microbial Communities throughout the Traditional Production of a Farmstead Cheese.mSystems · 2021Article
- Identification and evaluation of antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from raw ewes' and cows' milk collected in western Sicily: a preliminary investigation.Italian journal of food safety · 2020Article
- High Throughput Sequencing Technologies as a New Toolbox for Deep Analysis, Characterization and Potentially Authentication of Protection Designation of Origin Cheeses?International journal of food science · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial Activity of a Bacteriocin Produced byKorean journal for food science of animal resources · 2018Article
- Retrospective study on the hygienic quality of fresh ricotta cheeses produced in Sicily, Italy.Italian journal of food safety · 2018Article
- Stability of Bacteriocin-Like Inhibitory Substance (BLIS) Produced byBioMed research international · 2018Article
- Anti-Italian journal of food safety · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteriocins are antimicrobial proteins produced by bacteria that inhibit the growth of other bacteria with a bactericidal or bacteriostatic mode of action. Many lactic acid bacteria (LAB) produce a high diversity of different bacteriocins. Bacteriocinogenic LAB are generally recognised as safe (GRAS) and useful to control the frequent development of pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. For this reason they are commonly used as starter cultures in food fermentations. In this study, the authors describe the results of a screening on 699 LAB isolated from wooden vat surfaces, raw milk and traditional Sicilian cheeses, for the production of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances, by comparing two alternative methods. The antagonistic activity of LAB and its proteinaceous nature were evaluated using the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.