Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27800171›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2016

Temporal regulation of planarian eye regeneration.

Michelle E Deochand, Taylor R Birkholz, Wendy S Beane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cadmium sulfate induces apoptosis in planarians.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The planarianThe Journal of experimental biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Surgical Ablation Assay for Studying Eye Regeneration in Planarians.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle E DeochandDepartment of Biological Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo MI, USA.
Taylor R BirkholzDepartment of Biological Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo MI, USA.
Wendy S BeaneDepartment of Biological Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While tissue regeneration is typically studied using standard injury models, in nature injuries vary greatly in the amount and location of tissues lost. Planarians have the unique ability to regenerate from many different injuries (including from tiny fragments with no brain), allowing us to study the effects of different injuries on regeneration timelines. We followed the timing of regeneration for one organ, the eye, after multiple injury types that involved tissue loss (single- and double-eye ablation, and decapitation) in

Indexed as

Eyesinnervationnerve degenerationplanariaregeneration timing

Identifiers

PMID27800171
PMCPMC5084360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.