Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27800170›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2016

The cellular and molecular mechanisms of tissue repair and regeneration as revealed by studies in

Jingjing Li, Siwei Zhang, Enrique Amaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immune cells go with the tissue flow.Nature cell biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  10. Reactive oxygen species during heart regeneration in zebrafish: Lessons for future clinical therapies.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingjing LiDivision of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PT UK.
Siwei ZhangDivision of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PT UK.
Enrique AmayaDivision of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PT UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-8548

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L007525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival of any living organism critically depends on its ability to repair and regenerate damaged tissues and/or organs during its lifetime following injury, disease, or aging. Various animal models from invertebrates to vertebrates have been used to investigate the molecular and cellular mechanisms of wound healing and tissue regeneration. It is hoped that such studies will form the framework for identifying novel clinical treatments that will improve the healing and regenerative capacity of humans. Amongst these models,

Indexed as

limb regenerationscar‐free wound healingtail regenerationtissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID27800170
PMCPMC5084359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.