Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27800021›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2016

Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis.

Lana Zhovtis Ryerson, Rivka Green, Gladyne Confident, Krupa Pandey, Benjamin Richter, Tamar Bacon, Carrie Sammarco, Lisa Laing, Jennifer Kalina, Ilya Kister

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lana Zhovtis RyersonNYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, 240 East 38 Street, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Rivka GreenNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gladyne ConfidentNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Krupa PandeyBarnabas Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Benjamin RichterBarnabas Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Tamar BaconNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carrie SammarcoNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa LaingNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer KalinaNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ilya KisterNYU Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USMultiple Sclerosis Center Of Northeastern New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown.

methodsRetrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA).

resultsA total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing 'pre-DMF' (1 year) and 'on DMF' (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups).

conclusionEfficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These 'real-life' data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF.

Indexed as

Annualized relapse rateDimethyl FumarateMultiple SclerosisRace

Identifiers

PMID27800021
PMCPMC5066529
OpenAlexW2478431893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.