Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799910›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2016

An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis Study of Simple Motor Movements in Older and Young Adults.

Ted K Turesky, Peter E Turkeltaub, Guinevere F Eden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ted K TureskyCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, WashingtonDC, USA; Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, WashingtonDC, USA; Neurology Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, WashingtonDC, USA; Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, WashingtonDC, USA.
Guinevere F EdenCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

Training in Neural Injury &PlasticityT32NS041218 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARK P BURNS, Kathleen Anne Maguire-Zeiss · 2001 to 2026
$3.5M
A Comparison of the Neuro-developmental Basis of Reading in Two Writing SystemsR01HD056107 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, GUINEVERE F. · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
Supplement for Sikoya Ashburn to "An fMRI Study on the Neural Basis of Combined Math and Reading Disability"R01HD081078 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, GUINEVERE F. · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUKL2TR000102 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000102NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056107NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081078NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The functional neuroanatomy of finger movements has been characterized with neuroimaging in young adults. However, less is known about the aging motor system. Several studies have contrasted movement-related activity in older versus young adults, but there is inconsistency among their findings. To address this, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis on within-group data from older adults and young adults performing regularly paced right-hand finger movement tasks in response to external stimuli. We hypothesized that older adults would show a greater likelihood of activation in right cortical motor areas (i.e., ipsilateral to the side of movement) compared to young adults. ALE maps were examined for conjunction and between-group differences. Older adults showed overlapping likelihoods of activation with young adults in left primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), bilateral supplementary motor area, bilateral insula, left thalamus, and right anterior cerebellum. Their ALE map differed from that of the young adults in right SM1 (extending into dorsal premotor cortex), right supramarginal gyrus, medial premotor cortex, and right posterior cerebellum. The finding that older adults uniquely use ipsilateral regions for right-hand finger movements and show age-dependent modulations in regions recruited by both age groups provides a foundation by which to understand age-related motor decline and motor disorders.

Indexed as

agingfingerfMRImeta-analysismotormovementneuroimagingPET

Identifiers

PMID27799910
PMCPMC5065996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.