Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

Structure and Topology Dynamics of Hyper-Frequency Networks during Rest and Auditory Oddball Performance.

Viktor Müller, Dionysios Perdikis, Timo von Oertzen, Rita Sleimen-Malkoun, Viktor Jirsa, Ulman Lindenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viktor MüllerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin, Germany.
Dionysios PerdikisCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlin, Germany; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR_S 1106, Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseille, France.
Timo von OertzenDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rita Sleimen-MalkounInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR_S 1106, Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseille, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement UMR 7287, Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseille, France.
Viktor JirsaInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR_S 1106, Aix-Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Ulman LindenbergerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlin, Germany; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Aging ResearchBerlin, Germany; Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University InstituteSan Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state and task-related recordings are characterized by oscillatory brain activity and widely distributed networks of synchronized oscillatory circuits. Electroencephalographic recordings (EEG) were used to assess network structure and network dynamics during resting state with eyes open and closed, and auditory oddball performance through phase synchronization between EEG channels. For this assessment, we constructed a hyper-frequency network (HFN) based on within- and cross-frequency coupling (WFC and CFC, respectively) at 10 oscillation frequencies ranging between 2 and 20 Hz. We found that CFC generally differentiates between task conditions better than WFC. CFC was the highest during resting state with eyes open. Using a graph-theoretical approach (GTA), we found that HFNs possess small-world network (SWN) topology with a slight tendency to random network characteristics. Moreover, analysis of the temporal fluctuations of HFNs revealed specific network topology dynamics (NTD), i.e., temporal changes of different graph-theoretical measures such as strength, clustering coefficient, characteristic path length (CPL), local, and global efficiency determined for HFNs at different time windows. The different topology metrics showed significant differences between conditions in the mean and standard deviation of these metrics both across time and nodes. In addition, using an artificial neural network approach, we found stimulus-related dynamics that varied across the different network topology metrics. We conclude that functional connectivity dynamics (FCD), or NTD, which was found using the HFN approach during rest and stimulus processing, reflects temporal and topological changes in the functional organization and reorganization of neuronal cell assemblies.

Indexed as

auditory oddball performancedirectional couplingfunctional connectivitygraph-theoretical approachhyper-frequency networknetwork topology dynamicsresting state

Identifiers

PMID27799906
PMCPMC5065985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.