Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799791›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016

Differences in esophageal cancer characteristics and survival between Chinese and Caucasian patients in the SEER database.

Min-Qiang Lin, Yue-Ping Li, San-Gang Wu, Jia-Yuan Sun, Huan-Xin Lin, Shi-Yang Zhang, Zhen-Yu He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Esophageal carcinoma: Towards targeted therapies.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overview of esophageal cancer.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Qiang LinDepartment of Scientific Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen.
Yue-Ping LiPublic Health School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou.
San-Gang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen.
Jia-Yuan SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou.
Huan-Xin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou.
Shi-Yang ZhangDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Yu HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNFujian Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of Chinese and Caucasian esophageal cancer (EC) patients residing in the US, using a population-based national registry (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results [SEER]) database.

methodsPatients with EC were identified from the SEER program from 1988 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.

resultsA total of 479 Chinese and 35,748 Caucasian EC patients were identified. Compared with Caucasian patients, the Chinese patients had a later year of diagnosis, remained married after EC was diagnosed, had esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) more frequently, had tumors located in the upper-third and middle-third of the esophagus more frequently, and fewer patients presented with poorly/undifferentiated EC and underwent cancer-directed surgery. In Chinese patients, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) increased from 1988 to 2012 (

conclusionThe presenting demographic features, tumor characteristics, and outcomes of EC patients differed between Chinese and Caucasian patients residing in the US. Chinese patients diagnosed with EAC tended to share similar clinical features with their Caucasian counterparts, and the Chinese patients with ESCC had better OS than their Caucasian counterparts.

Indexed as

CaucasianChineseesophageal cancerSEERsurvival

Identifiers

PMID27799791
PMCPMC5077267
OpenAlexW2533404607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.