Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799515›Full record

GuidelineJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2016

Use of NCCN Guidelines, Other Guidelines, and Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Christina D Williams, William M Grady, Leah L Zullig

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Text Message Preferences for Surveillance Colonoscopy Reminders Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina D WilliamsFrom Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
William M GradyFrom Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Leah L ZulligFrom Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Identify and validate novel epigenetic molecular markers for colorectal neoplasmU01CA152756 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY, GUDA, KISHORE · 2010 to 2021
$6.7M
(PQC1) Accelerated biological aging and colon polyp to cancer progressionR01CA194663 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
HSRD VA CDA 13-025HSRD VA IK2 HX001345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194663NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a common cancer and significant public health burden. CRC-related mortality is declining, partly due to the early detection of CRC through robust screening. NCCN has established the NCCN Guidelines for CRC Screening to help healthcare providers make appropriate screening recommendations according to the patient's risk of developing CRC. This review describes the evolution of CRC screening guidelines for average-risk individuals, discusses the role of NCCN Guidelines for CRC Screening in cancer prevention, and comments on the current and emerging use of biomarkers for CRC screening.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27799515
PMCPMC5117951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.