ArticleNeurology2016
The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies.
Article in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiating glaucoma from chiasmal compression using optical coherence tomography: the macular naso-temporal ratio.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Functional alteration due to structural damage is network dependent: insight from multiple sclerosis.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Association of retinal atrophy with cortical lesions and leptomeningeal enhancement in multiple sclerosis on 7T MRI.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Article
- APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies.Neurology · 2021Article
- Retinal and brain damage during multiple sclerosis course: inflammatory activity is a key factor in the first 5 years.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AND HISTOLOGY OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION SUPPORT MITOCHONDRIA AS REFLECTIVITY SOURCES.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27799477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.