Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799340›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2.

Jana Batovska, Noel O I Cogan, Stacey E Lynch, Mark J Blacket

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in DNA Barcoding of Toxic Marine Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jana BatovskaBioSciences Research, Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia jana.batovska@ecodev.vic.gov.au.
Noel O I CoganBioSciences Research, Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Stacey E LynchBioSciences Research, Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Mark J BlacketBioSciences Research, Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7864-5712
AgriBio · AUAgriculture Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a popular DNA barcoding marker; however, in some animal species it is hypervariable and therefore difficult to sequence with traditional methods. With next-generation sequencing (NGS) it is possible to sequence all gene variants despite the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions/deletions (indels), homopolymeric regions, and microsatellites. Our aim was to compare the performance of Sanger sequencing and NGS amplicon sequencing in characterizing ITS2 in 26 mosquito species represented by 88 samples. The suitability of ITS2 as a DNA barcoding marker for mosquitoes, and its allelic diversity in individuals and species, was also assessed. Compared to Sanger sequencing, NGS was able to characterize the ITS2 region to a greater extent, with resolution within and between individuals and species that was previously not possible. A total of 382 unique sequences (alleles) were generated from the 88 mosquito specimens, demonstrating the diversity present that has been overlooked by traditional sequencing methods. Multiple indels and microsatellites were present in the ITS2 alleles, which were often specific to species or genera, causing variation in sequence length. As a barcoding marker, ITS2 was able to separate all of the species, apart from members of the Culex pipiens complex, providing the same resolution as the commonly used Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI). The ability to cost-effectively sequence hypervariable markers makes NGS an invaluable tool with many applications in the DNA barcoding field, and provides insights into the limitations of previous studies and techniques.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAllelesAnimalsCulicidaeDNA, IntergenicINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Intergenicamplicon sequencingCulicidaeindelsmicrosatellitesNGS

Identifiers

PMID27799340
PMCPMC5217108
OpenAlexW2562469886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.