Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799338›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Assessing the Gene Content of the Megagenome: Sugar Pine (Pinus lambertiana).

Daniel Gonzalez-Ibeas, Pedro J Martinez-Garcia, Randi A Famula, Annette Delfino-Mix, Kristian A Stevens, Carol A Loopstra, Charles H Langley, David B Neale, Jill L Wegrzyn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Gonzalez-IbeasDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269.
Pedro J Martinez-GarciaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Randi A FamulaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Annette Delfino-MixUnited States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Institute of Forest Genetics, Placerville, California 95667.
Kristian A StevensDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Carol A LoopstraDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
Charles H LangleyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
David B NealeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 dbneale@ucdavis.edu jill.wegrzyn@uconn.edu.
Jill L WegrzynDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269 dbneale@ucdavis.edu jill.wegrzyn@uconn.edu.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Connecticut · USTexas A&M University · USUS Forest Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Douglas) is within the subgenus Strobus with an estimated genome size of 31 Gbp. Transcriptomic resources are of particular interest in conifers due to the challenges presented in their megagenomes for gene identification. In this study, we present the first comprehensive survey of the P. lambertiana transcriptome through deep sequencing of a variety of tissue types to generate more than 2.5 billion short reads. Third generation, long reads generated through PacBio Iso-Seq have been included for the first time in conifers to combat the challenges associated with de novo transcriptome assembly. A technology comparison is provided here to contribute to the otherwise scarce comparisons of second and third generation transcriptome sequencing approaches in plant species. In addition, the transcriptome reference was essential for gene model identification and quality assessment in the parallel project responsible for sequencing and assembly of the entire genome. In this study, the transcriptomic data were also used to address questions surrounding lineage-specific Dicer-like proteins in conifers. These proteins play a role in the control of transposable element proliferation and the related genome expansion in conifers.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantGenomicsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyPinusRibonuclease IIITranscriptomeMicroRNAsRibonuclease IIIconiferDCLdicergymnospermRNA-Seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27799338
PMCPMC5144951
OpenAlexW2567112363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.