Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799330›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2017

Antibody Response to Lyme Disease Spirochetes in the Context of VlsE-Mediated Immune Evasion.

Artem S Rogovskyy, David C Gillis, Yurij Ionov, Ekaterina Gerasimov, Alex Zelikovsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbes and Mental Illness: Past, Present, and Future.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Comparative transcriptome analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Testing Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic approach for Lyme disease patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Artem S RogovskyyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA arogovskyy@cvm.tamu.edu.
David C GillisDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Yurij IonovDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Rosewell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Ekaterina GerasimovDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alex ZelikovskyDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Georgia State University · USTexas A&M University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease (LD), the most prevalent tick-borne illness in North America, is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi The long-term survival of B. burgdorferi spirochetes in the mammalian host is achieved though VlsE-mediated antigenic variation. It is mathematically predicted that a highly variable surface antigen prolongs bacterial infection sufficiently to exhaust the immune response directed toward invariant surface antigens. If the prediction is correct, it is expected that the antibody response to B. burgdorferi invariant antigens will become nonprotective as B. burgdorferi infection progresses. To test this assumption, changes in the protective efficacy of the immune response to B. burgdorferi surface antigens were monitored via a superinfection model over the course of 70 days. B. burgdorferi-infected mice were subjected to secondary challenge by heterologous B. burgdorferi at different time points postinfection (p.i.). When the infected mice were superinfected with a VlsE-deficient clone (ΔVlsE) at day 28 p.i., the active anti-B. burgdorferi immune response did not prevent ΔVlsE-induced spirochetemia. In contrast, most mice blocked culture-detectable spirochetemia induced by wild-type B. burgdorferi (WT), indicating that VlsE was likely the primary target of the antibody response. As the B. burgdorferi infection further progressed, however, reversed outcomes were observed. At day 70 p.i. the host immune response to non-VlsE antigens became sufficiently potent to clear spirochetemia induced by ΔVlsE and yet failed to prevent WT-induced spirochetemia. To test if any significant changes in the anti-B. burgdorferi antibody repertoire accounted for the observed outcomes, global profiles of antibody specificities were determined. However, comparison of mimotopes revealed no major difference between day 28 and day 70 antibody repertoires.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationAntigenic VariationAntigens, BacterialAntigens, SurfaceBacterial ProteinsBorrelia burgdorferiImmune EvasionLipoproteinsLyme DiseaseMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HNorth AmericaAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialAntigens, SurfaceBacterial ProteinsLipoproteinsVlsE protein, Borrelia burgdorferiantibody repertoireantibody responseBorrelia burgdorferiLyme diseasemimotopesprotective efficacysuppressionVlsE

Identifiers

PMID27799330
PMCPMC5203654
OpenAlexW2543833198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.