Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799201›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Efficacy of High-Dose Meropenem (Six Grams per Day) in Treatment of Experimental Murine Pneumonia Induced by Meropenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Kazuhiro Oshima, Shigeki Nakamura, Naoki Iwanaga, Koji Takemoto, Taiga Miyazaki, Kastunori Yanagihara, Yoshitsugu Miyazaki, Hiroshi Mukae, Shigeru Kohno, Koichi Izumikawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Variation in Mutant Prevention Concentrations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhiro OshimaLeading Program, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shigeki NakamuraDepartment of Chemotherapy and Mycoses, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan shigekinak@nih.go.jp.
Naoki IwanagaDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Koji TakemotoDrug Development Research Laboratories, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Taiga MiyazakiUnit of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kastunori YanagiharaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yoshitsugu MiyazakiDepartment of Chemotherapy and Mycoses, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MukaeDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shigeru KohnoDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Koichi IzumikawaUnit of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPNagasaki University Hospital · JPSumitomo Dainippon Pharma (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dose meropenem (MEPM; 6 g/day) has been approved as a treatment for purulent meningitis; however, little is known regarding its in vivo efficacy in refractory lower respiratory tract infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MEPM at 6 g/day in a murine model of severe pneumonia caused by MEPM-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Experimental pneumonia induced by MEPM-resistant P. aeruginosa was treated with normal-dose MEPM (150 mg/kg of body weight, simulating a 3-g/day regimen in humans) or high-dose MEPM (500 mg/kg, simulating a 6-g/day regimen in humans). Mice treated with high-dose MEPM showed significantly restored survival relative to that of untreated mice and tended to show a survival rate higher than that of mice treated with normal-dose MEPM. The viable bacterial counts (of two clinical isolates) in the lungs decreased significantly in mice treated with high-dose MEPM from those for untreated mice (P < 0.001) or mice treated with normal-dose MEPM (P, <0.01 and <0.05). The number of inflammatory cells in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was also significantly lower in mice treated with high-dose MEPM than in untreated mice. The free MEPM concentration in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exceeded 16 μg/ml for 85 min in mice treated with high-dose MEPM, but not for mice treated with normal-dose MEPM. Our results demonstrate that high-dose MEPM (6 g/day) might provide better protection against pneumonia caused by MEPM-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa than the dose normally administered (less than 3 g/day).

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AvailabilityBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLungMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumonia, BacterialPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRespiratory MucosaSurvival AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemThienamycinshigh dosemeropenemmeropenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosapharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID27799201
PMCPMC5192154
OpenAlexW2545993750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.