Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799180›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2016

High PEEP in acute respiratory distress syndrome: quantitative evaluation between improved arterial oxygenation and decreased oxygen delivery.

M Chikhani, A Das, M Haque, W Wang, D G Bates, J G Hardman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04297397 (Personalised Simulation Technologies for Optimising Treatment in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04297397 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Personalised Simulation Technologies for Optimising Treatment in the Intensive Care Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2020 to 2022Enrolled25ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Respiratory Insufficiency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative Analysis of 5 cmH₂O Versus 10 cmH₂O PEEP on Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Imaging the Lung in ARDS: A Primer.Respiratory care · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. A systematic review of cardiacProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. ARDS associated acute brain injury: from the lung to the brain.European journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M ChikhaniAnaesthesia and Critical Care Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK marc.chikhani@nottingham.ac.uk.
A DasSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
M HaqueAnaesthesia and Critical Care Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
W WangSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
D G BatesSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
J G HardmanAnaesthesia and Critical Care Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK marc.chikhani@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used to improve oxygenation and prevent alveolar collapse in mechanically ventilated patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although PEEP improves arterial oxygenation predictably, high-PEEP strategies have demonstrated equivocal improvements in ARDS-related mortality. The effect of PEEP on tissue oxygen delivery is poorly understood and is difficult to quantify or investigate in the clinical environment.

methodsWe investigated the effects of PEEP on tissue oxygen delivery in ARDS using a new, high-fidelity, computational model with highly integrated respiratory and cardiovascular systems. The model was configured to replicate published clinical trial data on the responses of 12 individual ARDS patients to changes in PEEP. These virtual patients were subjected to increasing PEEP levels during a lung-protective ventilation strategy (0-20 cm H

resultsAs PEEP increased, tissue oxygen delivery decreased in all subjects (mean reduction of 25% at 20 cm H

conclusionsIncremental PEEP in ARDS appears to protect alveoli and improve arterial oxygenation, but also appears to impair tissue oxygen delivery significantly because of reduced cardiac output. We propose that this trade-off may explain the poor improvements in mortality associated with high-PEEP ventilation strategies.

Indexed as

Blood Gas AnalysisComputer SimulationEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansOxygenPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeOxygencomputer simulationrespiration, artificialrespiratory distress syndrome, adult

Identifiers

PMID27799180
PMCPMC5091333
OpenAlexW2542660328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.