Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799150›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2016

Rapid movement and transcriptional re-localization of human cohesin on DNA.

Iain F Davidson, Daniela Goetz, Maciej P Zaczek, Maxim I Molodtsov, Pim J Huis In 't Veld, Florian Weissmann, Gabriele Litos, David A Cisneros, Maria Ocampo-Hafalla, Rene Ladurner and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcription and Three-Dimensional Genome Organization: Cause, Consequence, or Coordination?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aberrant cohesin function inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. NIPBL and STAG1 enable loop extrusion by providing differential DNA-cohesin affinity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Iain F DavidsonResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Daniela GoetzResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Maciej P ZaczekResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Maxim I MolodtsovResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Pim J Huis In 't VeldResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Florian WeissmannResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Gabriele LitosResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
David A CisnerosResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Maria Ocampo-HafallaThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Rene LadurnerResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Frank UhlmannThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Alipasha VaziriResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.
Jan-Michael PetersResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria peters@imp.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-3195
Research Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 3407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial organization, correct expression, repair, and segregation of eukaryotic genomes depend on cohesin, ring-shaped protein complexes that are thought to function by entrapping DNA It has been proposed that cohesin is recruited to specific genomic locations from distal loading sites by an unknown mechanism, which depends on transcription, and it has been speculated that cohesin movements along DNA could create three-dimensional genomic organization by loop extrusion. However, whether cohesin can translocate along DNA is unknown. Here, we used single-molecule imaging to show that cohesin can diffuse rapidly on DNA in a manner consistent with topological entrapment and can pass over some DNA-bound proteins and nucleosomes but is constrained in its movement by transcription and DNA-bound CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). These results indicate that cohesin can be positioned in the genome by moving along DNA, that transcription can provide directionality to these movements, that CTCF functions as a boundary element for moving cohesin, and they are consistent with the hypothesis that cohesin spatially organizes the genome via loop extrusion.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNAHumansRepressor ProteinsSingle Molecule ImagingTime FactorsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsCTCF protein, humanDNARepressor Proteinscell cyclecohesingenome organizationsingle‐molecule TIRF microscopytranscription

Identifiers

PMID27799150
PMCPMC5167347
OpenAlexW2543542605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.