Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799081›Full record

ArticleSocioaffective neuroscience & psychology2016

Do rats have orgasms?

James G Pfaus, Tina Scardochio, Mayte Parada, Christine Gerson, Gonzalo R Quintana, Genaro A Coria-Avila

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Reply to Quintana et al.: Behavior is an unlikely mediator of fluoxetine effects on ovulation in rabbits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modeling Human Sexual Motivation in Rodents: Some Caveats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James G PfausDepartment of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada; jim.pfaus@concordia.ca.
Tina ScardochioDepartment of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Mayte ParadaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Christine GersonDepartment of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Gonzalo R QuintanaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Genaro A Coria-AvilaCentro de Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, VER, México.
Concordia University · CAMcGill University · CAUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough humans experience orgasms with a degree of statistical regularity, they remain among the most enigmatic of sexual responses; difficult to define and even more difficult to study empirically. The question of whether animals experience orgasms is hampered by similar lack of definition and the additional necessity of making inferences from behavioral responses.

methodHere we define three behavioral criteria, based on dimensions of the subjective experience of human orgasms described by Mah and Binik, to infer orgasm-like responses (OLRs) in other species: 1) physiological criteria that include pelvic floor and anal muscle contractions that stimulate seminal emission and/or ejaculation in the male, or that stimulate uterine and cervical contractions in the female; 2) short-term behavioral changes that reflect immediate awareness of a pleasurable hedonic reward state during copulation; and 3) long-term behavioral changes that depend on the reward state induced by the OLR, including sexual satiety, the strengthening of patterns of sexual arousal and desire in subsequent copulations, and the generation of conditioned place and partner preferences for contextual and partner-related cues associated with the reward state. We then examine whether physiological and behavioral data from observations of male and female rats during copulation, and in sexually-conditioned place- and partner-preference paradigms, are consistent with these criteria.

resultsBoth male and female rats display behavioral patterns consistent with OLRs.

conclusionsThe ability to infer OLRs in rats offers new possibilities to study the phenomenon in neurobiological and molecular detail, and to provide both comparative and translational perspectives that would be useful for both basic and clinical research.

Indexed as

animalsconditioned preferencedopaminefemalegenitosensorymaleopioidspleasuresexultrasonic vocalizations

Identifiers

PMID27799081
PMCPMC5087696
OpenAlexW2535567274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.