Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27799017›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017

The Perceived Impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on Coordination and Integration of Care: A Qualitative Analysis.

Dennis McCarty, Traci Rieckmann, Robin L Baker, K John McConnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Peer support for patients with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: A narrative review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dennis McCartyDr. McCarty, Dr. Rieckmann, and Ms. Baker are with the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU)-Portland State University School of Public Health, and Dr. McConnell is with the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, OHSU, Portland (e-mail: mccartyd@ohsu.edu ).
Traci RieckmannDr. McCarty, Dr. Rieckmann, and Ms. Baker are with the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU)-Portland State University School of Public Health, and Dr. McConnell is with the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, OHSU, Portland (e-mail: mccartyd@ohsu.edu ).
Robin L BakerDr. McCarty, Dr. Rieckmann, and Ms. Baker are with the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU)-Portland State University School of Public Health, and Dr. McConnell is with the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, OHSU, Portland (e-mail: mccartyd@ohsu.edu ).
K John McConnellDr. McCarty, Dr. Rieckmann, and Ms. Baker are with the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU)-Portland State University School of Public Health, and Dr. McConnell is with the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, OHSU, Portland (e-mail: mccartyd@ohsu.edu ).

Funding

Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS, SORENSEN, JAMES L · 2002 to 2015
$25.2M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
Traditional Service Core [Translational Service Core (TSC)]P50DA018165 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BELKNAP, JOHN K · 2006 to 2016
$13.0M
Substance Abuse Treatment Pathways for Employee GroupsP50DA010233 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HORGAN, CONSTANCE M. · 1995 to 2008
$6.8M
Integrating Addiction Treatment and Medical Care in a Commercial Health PlanR01DA029716 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
To Test A Payer/Treatment Agency Intervention to Increase Use of BuprenorphineR01DA030431 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MOLFENTER, TODD DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
Oregon's Coordinated Care Organizations Integrate Care for Drug Use DisordersR33DA035640 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIND, BONNIE · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Evaluating Coordinated Care OrganizationsR01MH100001 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LINDROOTH, RICHARD C., MCCONNELL, KENNETH JOHN · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA010233NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA018165NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030431NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA035640NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTitle 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2) controls the release of patient information about treatment for substance use disorders. In 2016, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a proposed rule to update the regulations, reduce provider burdens, and facilitate information exchange. Oregon's Medicaid program (Oregon Health Plan) altered the financing and structure of medical, dental, and behavioral care to promote greater integration and coordination. A qualitative analysis examined the perceived impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on care coordination and integration.

methodsInterviews with 76 stakeholders (114 interviews) conducted in 2012-2015 probed the processes of integrating behavioral health into primary care settings in Oregon and assessed issues associated with adherence to 42 CFR Part 2.

resultsRespondents expressed concerns that the regulations caused legal confusion, inhibited communication and information sharing, and required updating. Addiction treatment directors noted the challenges of obtaining patient consent to share information with primary care providers.

conclusionsThe confidentiality regulations were perceived as a barrier to care coordination and integration. The Oregon Health Authority, therefore, requested regulatory changes. SAMHSA's proposed revisions permit a general consent to an entire health care team and allow inclusion of substance use disorder information within health information exchanges, but they mandate data segmentation of diagnostic and procedure codes related to substance use disorders and restrict access only to parties with authorized consent, possibly adding barriers to the coordination and integration of addiction treatment with primary care.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityGuideline AdherenceHumansMental Health ServicesOregonPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesUnited States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationAddiction treatmentAlcohol use disordersConfidentialityDrug use disordersPublic policy issues

Identifiers

PMID27799017
PMCPMC5441679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.