Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798767›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2016

Practical Management of Anaesthesia in the Elderly.

Camilla Strøm, Lars Simon Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Does supine versus lateral position affect operative time and reduction quality for elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Anesthetic management of geriatric patients.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla StrømDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. cstr@regionsjaelland.dk.
Lars Simon RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob SteinmetzDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elderly population is rapidly growing and particularly diverse. Ageing leads to reduced organ function and a decline in physiologic reserve. Elderly patients are characterised by great inter-individual variability in physiological function with a high prevalence of chronic disease. In general, older patients have a higher risk of postoperative adverse outcomes, and frailty is a very important risk factor. This review article aims to provide a practical guide to anaesthetic management of the elderly surgical patient. To optimise care, clinicians should be familiar with the typical physiologic changes related to ageing and the implications for anaesthetic management. All anaesthetic techniques, methods and agents can be applied, if tailored to the patient's physiologic and pathologic changes. The elderly are more sensitive to anaesthetics, meaning that desired sedative and analgesic effects are reached at lower doses compared with younger patients, and the haemodynamic depressing side effects of anaesthetics are often more pronounced. To reduce the risk of circulatory collapse, the clinician should carefully titrate anaesthetics and await the response with patience. The dose of neuromuscular blocking agents should rarely be reduced for intubation, but the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking agents is often prolonged and difficult to predict. Perioperative neuromuscular monitoring is therefore strongly recommended. In the postoperative period, prevention of avoidable morbidity and functional decline is crucial; comprehensive multidisciplinary care and multimodal interventions may facilitate earlier recovery and decrease the risk of complications.

Indexed as

AgedAgingAnesthesiaAnestheticsDrug MonitoringHumansHypnotics and SedativesPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareAnestheticsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID27798767
OpenAlexW2545217334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.