ArticlePloS one2016
Effect of Age on Breast Cancer Patient Prognoses: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER 18 Database.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Association between Early-Onset Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Patients Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.F1000Research · 2024Pooled it
- Does Laterality in Breast Cancer still have the Importance to be Studied? A Meta-analysis of Patients with Breast Cancer.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Pooled it
- Circadian rhythm disrupting behaviours and cancer outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Pooled it
- HER2Ile655Val Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Associated with Early-Onset Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of Comorbidities and Age on Cause-Specific Mortality in Postmenopausal Patients with Breast Cancer.The oncologist · 2019Trial
- Interpretable machine-learning survival prediction of breast cancer prognosis from lifestyle factors: evidence from UK biobank.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a SEER-derived prognostic nomogram for non-metastatic Asian breast cancer patients.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for overall survival in elderly Asian American women with breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Long-term prognostic implications of AI-detected versus AI-undetected breast cancers on mammography: a propensity score-matched analysis.European radiology · 2026Article
- Adverse childhood experiences, adult adiposity, and risk of young-onset breast cancer subtypes in a population-based case-control study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Nomogram prediction for breast cancer-specific survival in patients with ERTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Scoring System for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Among Women in Regions with Limited Healthcare Infrastructure in Indonesia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Age-dependent differences in survival of patients with early breast cancer: analysis of SUCCESS A, B, C trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Potential profile analysis of return-to-work readiness and self-efficacy in postoperative breast cancer patients who have returned to work.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Social inequalities in survival among women with breast cancer in southeastern Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
- Unveiling age-differentiated pathways: spiritual well-being links to quality of life in breast cancer survivors through network analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Patterns and associated factors of online health information seeking behaviors among young women diagnosed with breast cancer in China.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Multimodal deep learning model for prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk and correlation with oncotype DX.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- The association between young age at metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and overall survival in the EMBRACE study.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Proteogenomic characterization of invasive breast tumors in young women.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge is an important risk factor for breast cancer, but data regarding whether patient age at diagnosis is related to breast cancer survival are conflicting. This population-based study evaluated the effect of age on breast cancer prognosis and identified outcome-related factors. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and enrolled female primary non-metastatic cases. Patients were subdivided into seven groups, and analyses of the associations between age and overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model, respectively. We also assessed differences in survival among three specific age groups, using the ages of 30 and 50 years as cut-offs. Stratified analyses regarding race, histology, grade, stage and hormone receptor status were also carried out.
resultsA total of 133,057 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2004 to 2008 were included in the current study (6.4% <40 years), Women aged 40 to 49 years and 60 to 69 years exhibited significantly better OS and BCSS, respectively (log-rank, p<0.001), than their counterparts in other groups. Middle-aged women exhibited distinctly better OS (log-rank, p<0.001) and BCSS (log-rank, p<0.001) than their counterparts in the other two age groups. Following adjustments for potential confounding factors, middle-age at breast cancer diagnosis was shown to be an independent predictor of favourable outcomes in terms of OS, but not BCSS (for OS, HR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.87-0.98; p = 0.007; for BCSS, HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.80-1.01; p = 0.075, using the young group as reference). Stratified analysis showed that middle-age was significantly associated with increased survival, except among patients with stage III disease, and that elderly women faced worse prognoses than younger patients.
conclusionOur results indicate that younger breast cancer patients exhibit more aggressive disease than older patients. Middle-aged patients exhibit better OS and BCSS than young and elderly patients but exhibit BCSS rates similar to those of young patients after adjustments for confounders. Stratified analysis demonstrated that middle-aged patients exhibited better survival than young patients, with the exception of patients with stage III disease. An age of 60 years or more was a significant independent predictor of a poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.