Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798632›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2017

A faithful internal representation of walking movements in the Drosophila visual system.

Terufumi Fujiwara, Tomás L Cruz, James P Bohnslav, M Eugenia Chiappe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On analogies in vertebrate and insect visual systems.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biased cell adhesion organizes a circuit for visual motion integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terufumi FujiwaraChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tomás L CruzChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
James P BohnslavChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
M Eugenia ChiappeChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of sensorimotor signals to internally estimate self-movement is critical for spatial perception and motor control. However, which neural circuits accurately track body motion and how these circuits control movement remain unknown. We found that a population of Drosophila neurons that were sensitive to visual flow patterns typically generated during locomotion, the horizontal system (HS) cells, encoded unambiguous quantitative information about the fly's walking behavior independently of vision. Angular and translational velocity signals were integrated with a behavioral-state signal and generated direction-selective and speed-sensitive graded changes in the membrane potential of these non-spiking cells. The nonvisual direction selectivity of HS cells cooperated with their visual selectivity only when the visual input matched that expected from the fly's movements, thereby revealing a circuit for internally monitoring voluntary walking. Furthermore, given that HS cells promoted leg-based turning, the activity of these cells could be used to control forward walking.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterLocomotionMotion PerceptionNeuronsPhotic StimulationVision, OcularWalking

Identifiers

PMID27798632
OpenAlexW2543689082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.