ArticleSystematic biology2017
Construction of a Species-Level Tree of Life for the Insects and Utility in Taxonomic Profiling.
Article in Systematic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2,366 new mitochondrial genomes with preliminary identification and phylogeny of >5,500 putative species of beetles.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics of Combined Nuclear and Mitochondrial Phylogenomics to Define Key Nodes for the Classification of Coleoptera.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Haplodiploidy and the evolution of eusociality: A long-standing question is finally resolved.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- No evidence that haplodiploidy favors the evolution of eusociality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Enables Alignment-Free Distance Calculation and Phylogenetic Placement Using k-Mer Frequencies.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- HAPP: High-accuracy pipeline for processing deep metabarcoding data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Data of the Insect Biome Atlas: a metabarcoding survey of the terrestrial arthropods of Sweden and Madagascar.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A shortcut to sample coverage standardization in metabarcoding data provides new insights into land-use effects on insect diversity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Arthropod Phylotranscriptomics With a Special Focus on the Basal Phylogeny of the Myriapoda.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Alternative measures of trait-niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Phylogenomic analysis of Wolbachia genomes from the Darwin Tree of Life biodiversity genomics project.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Global gradients in the distribution of animal polyploids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.Oecologia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although comprehensive phylogenies have proven an invaluable tool in ecology and evolution, their construction is made increasingly challenging both by the scale and structure of publically available sequences. The distinct partition between gene-rich (genomic) and species-rich (DNA barcode) data is a feature of data that has been largely overlooked, yet presents a key obstacle to scaling supermatrix analysis. I present a phyloinformatics framework for draft construction of a species-level phylogeny of insects (Class Insecta). Matrix-building requires separately optimized pipelines for nuclear transcriptomic, mitochondrial genomic, and species-rich markers, whereas tree-building requires hierarchical inference in order to capture species-breadth while retaining deep-level resolution. The phylogeny of insects contains 49,358 species, 13,865 genera, 760 families. Deep-level splits largely reflected previous findings for sections of the tree that are data rich or unambiguous, such as inter-ordinal Endopterygota and Dictyoptera, the recently evolved and relatively homogeneous Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Brachycera (Diptera), and Cucujiformia (Coleoptera). However, analysis of bias, matrix construction and gene-tree variation suggests confidence in some relationships (such as in Polyneoptera) is less than has been indicated by the matrix bootstrap method. To assess the utility of the insect tree as a tool in query profiling several tree-based taxonomic assignment methods are compared. Using test data sets with existing taxonomic annotations, a tendency is observed for greater accuracy of species-level assignments where using a fixed comprehensive tree of life in contrast to methods generating smaller de novo reference trees. Described herein is a solution to the discrepancy in the way data are fit into supermatrices. The resulting tree facilitates wider studies of insect diversification and application of advanced descriptions of diversity in community studies, among other presumed applications. [Data integration; data mining; insects; phylogenomics; phyloinformatics; tree of life.].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.