Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798344›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2016

Obese Mice Fed a Diet Supplemented with Enzyme-Treated Wheat Bran Display Marked Shifts in the Liver Metabolome Concurrent with Altered Gut Bacteria.

Dorothy A Kieffer, Brian D Piccolo, Maria L Marco, Eun Bae Kim, Michael L Goodson, Michael J Keenan, Tamara N Dunn, Knud Erik Bach Knudsen, Sean H Adams, Roy J Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dorothy A KiefferGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and.
Brian D PiccoloArkansas Children's Nutrition Center and.
Maria L MarcoFood Science and Technology Department, and.
Eun Bae KimFood Science and Technology Department, and.
Michael L GoodsonDepartment of Microbiology, University of California, Davis, CA.
Michael J KeenanLouisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA; and.
Tamara N DunnGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and.
Knud Erik Bach KnudsenDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sean H AdamsGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and rmartin@agcenter.lsu.edu shadams@uams.edu.
Roy J MartinGraduate Group in Nutritional Biology and rmartin@agcenter.lsu.edu shadams@uams.edu.
University of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · USAarhus University · DKArkansas Children's Nutrition Center · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnzyme-treated wheat bran (ETWB) contains a fermentable dietary fiber previously shown to decrease liver triglycerides (TGs) and modify the gut microbiome in mice. It is not clear which mechanisms explain how ETWB feeding affects hepatic metabolism, but factors (i.e., xenometabolites) associated with specific microbes may be involved.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to characterize ETWB-driven shifts in the cecal microbiome and to identify correlates between microbial changes and diet-related differences in liver metabolism in diet-induced obese mice that typically display steatosis.

methodsFive-week-old male C57BL/6J mice fed a 45%-lard-based fat diet supplemented with ETWB (20% wt:wt) or rapidly digestible starch (control) (n = 15/group) for 10 wk were characterized by using a multi-omics approach. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify variables that were strong discriminators between the ETWB and control groups.

resultsBody weight and liver TGs were decreased by ETWB feeding (by 10% and 25%, respectively; P < 0.001), and an index of liver reactive oxygen species was increased (by 29%; P < 0.01). The cecal microbiome showed an increase in Bacteroidetes (by 42%; P < 0.05) and a decrease in Firmicutes (by 16%; P < 0.05). Metabolites that were strong discriminators between the ETWB and control groups included decreased liver antioxidants (glutathione and α-tocopherol); decreased liver carbohydrate metabolites, including glucose; lower hepatic arachidonic acid; and increased liver and plasma β-hydroxybutyrate. Liver transcriptomics revealed key metabolic pathways affected by ETWB, especially those related to lipid metabolism and some fed- or fasting-regulated genes.

conclusionsTogether, these changes indicate that dietary fibers such as ETWB regulate hepatic metabolism concurrently with specific gut bacteria community shifts in C57BL/6J mice. It is proposed that these changes may elicit gut-derived signals that reach the liver via enterohepatic circulation, ultimately affecting host liver metabolism in a manner that mimics, in part, the fasting state.

Indexed as

AdiposityAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaDietDietary FiberDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal TractGene Expression RegulationLiverMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesityDietary Fiberdietary fibergut microbiotametabolomicstranscriptomicsxenobiotic

Identifiers

PMID27798344
PMCPMC5118767
OpenAlexW2535154069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.