Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798311›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Eradicating infectious disease using weakly transmissible vaccines.

Scott L Nuismer, Benjamin M Althouse, Ryan May, James J Bull, Sean P Stromberg, Rustom Antia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Quantifying the effectiveness of betaherpesvirus-vectored transmissible vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Self-disseminating vaccines to suppress zoonoses.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging viruses and current strategies for vaccine intervention.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Scott L NuismerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA snuismer@uidaho.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9817-0056
Benjamin M AlthouseInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bellevue, WA 98005, USA.
Ryan MayDepartment of Mathematics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
James J BullIntegrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Sean P StrombergBioinformatics, Omniome Inc., 10575 Roselle Street, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Rustom AntiaDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Altanta, GA 30322, USA.
University of Idaho · USEmory University · USNew Mexico State University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Understanding Transmission with Integrated Genetic and Epidemiologic InferenceU54GM111274 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI VESPIGNANI, ALESSANDRO · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
Modeling the dynamics and evolution of immune responses to influenza virusesU19AI117891 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, ANTIA, RUSTOM NOSHIR · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
Experimental viral evolution at high mutation rateR01GM057756 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI BULL, JAMES J · 1998 to 2013
$2.9M
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH: A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF TRANSMISSIBLE VACCINES R01GM122079 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI SCOTT L NUISMER · 2016 to 2026
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI117891NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057756NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122079NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM111274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral vaccines have had remarkable positive impacts on human health as well as the health of domestic animal populations. Despite impressive vaccine successes, however, many infectious diseases cannot yet be efficiently controlled or eradicated through vaccination, often because it is impossible to vaccinate a sufficient proportion of the population. Recent advances in molecular biology suggest that the centuries-old method of individual-based vaccine delivery may be on the cusp of a major revolution. Specifically, genetic engineering brings to life the possibility of a live, transmissible vaccine. Unfortunately, releasing a highly transmissible vaccine poses substantial evolutionary risks, including reversion to high virulence as has been documented for the oral polio vaccine. An alternative, and far safer approach, is to rely on genetically engineered and weakly transmissible vaccines that have reduced scope for evolutionary reversion. Here, we use mathematical models to evaluate the potential efficacy of such weakly transmissible vaccines. Our results demonstrate that vaccines with even a modest ability to transmit can significantly lower the incidence of infectious disease and facilitate eradication efforts. Consequently, weakly transmissible vaccines could provide an important tool for controlling infectious disease in wild and domestic animal populations and for reducing the risks of emerging infectious disease in humans.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesDisease EradicationHumansVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesVirulenceVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccinesdiseasegenetic engineeringherd immunityself-disseminating vaccinetransmissible vaccinevaccine

Identifiers

PMID27798311
PMCPMC5095390
OpenAlexW2543091332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.