Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798234›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2016

Nuclear constriction segregates mobile nuclear proteins away from chromatin.

Jerome Irianto, Charlotte R Pfeifer, Rachel R Bennett, Yuntao Xia, Irena L Ivanovska, Andrea J Liu, Roger A Greenberg, Dennis E Discher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jerome IriantoPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Charlotte R PfeiferPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Rachel R BennettPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Yuntao XiaPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Irena L IvanovskaPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Andrea J LiuPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Roger A GreenbergPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Dennis E DischerPhysical Sciences Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 discher@seas.upenn.edu.
Physical Sciences (United States) · USCancer Research Institute · US

Funding

PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
DNA Double Strand Break Chromatin Alterations and Genome IntegrityR01GM101149 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GREENBERG, ROGER A · 2013 to 2025
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a cell squeezes its nucleus through adjacent tissue, penetrates a basement membrane, or enters a small blood capillary, chromatin density and nuclear factors could in principle be physically perturbed. Here, in cancer cell migration through rigid micropores and in passive pulling into micropipettes, local compaction of chromatin is observed coincident with depletion of mobile factors. Heterochromatin/euchromatin was previously estimated from molecular mobility measurements to occupy a volume fraction f of roughly two-thirds of the nuclear volume, but based on the relative intensity of DNA and histones in several cancer cell lines drawn into narrow constrictions, f can easily increase locally to nearly 100%. By contrast, mobile proteins in the nucleus, including a dozen that function as DNA repair proteins (e.g., BRCA1, 53BP1) or nucleases (e.g., Cas9, FokI), are depleted within the constriction, approaching 0%. Such losses-compounded by the occasional rupture of the nuclear envelope-can have important functional consequences. Studies of a nuclease that targets a locus in chromosome-1 indeed show that constricted migration delays DNA damage.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell MovementCell NucleusChromatinEuchromatinHeterochromatinHistonesHumansModels, BiologicalNuclear EnvelopeNuclear ProteinsChromatinEuchromatinHeterochromatinHistonesNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27798234
PMCPMC5156542
OpenAlexW2539909336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.