ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Noisy Juxtacellular Stimulation In Vivo Leads to Reliable Spiking and Reveals High-Frequency Coding in Single Neurons.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluctuation-response relations for a two-stage population of spiking neurons stimulated by common noise.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on Spike train correlation in two-compartment model neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Effect of burst spikes on linear and nonlinear signal transmission in spiking neurons.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ultrafast population coding and axo-somatic compartmentalization.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Theta activity paradoxically boosts gamma and ripple frequency sensitivity in prefrontal interneurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- A network model of the barrel cortex combined with a differentiator detector reproduces features of the behavioral response to single-neuron stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Low-rate firing limit for neurons with axon, soma and dendrites driven by spatially distributed stochastic synapses.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Dynamic Gain Analysis Reveals Encoding Deficiencies in Cortical Neurons That Recover from Hypoxia-Induced Spreading Depolarizations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- How single neuron properties shape chaotic dynamics and signal transmission in random neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Weak electric fields promote resonance in neuronal spiking activity: Analytical results from two-compartment cell and network models.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- An axon initial segment is required for temporal precision in action potential encoding by neuronal populations.Science advances · 2018Article
- Article
- Exact analytical results for integrate-and-fire neurons driven by excitatory shot noise.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Temporally precise control of single-neuron spiking by juxtacellular nanostimulation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single cells in the motor and somatosensory cortex of rats were stimulated in vivo with broadband fluctuating currents applied juxtacellularly. Unlike the DC current steps used previously, fluctuating stimulation currents reliably evoked spike trains with precise timing of individual spikes. Fluctuating currents resulted in strong cellular responses at stimulation frequencies beyond the inverse membrane time constant and the mean firing rate of the neuron. Neuronal firing was associated with high rates of information transmission, even for the high-frequency components of the stimulus. Such response characteristics were also revealed in additional experiments with sinusoidal juxtacellular stimulation. For selected cells, we could reproduce these statistics with compartmental models of varying complexity. We also developed a method to generate Gaussian stimuli that evoke spike trains with prescribed spike times (under the constraint of a certain rate and coefficient of variation) and exemplify its ability to achieve precise and reliable spiking in cortical neurons in vivo Our results demonstrate a novel method for precise control of spike timing by juxtacellular stimulation, confirm and extend earlier conclusions from ex vivo work about the capacity of cortical neurons to generate precise discharges, and contribute to the understanding of the biophysics of information transfer of single neurons in vivo at high frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nanostimulation of single identified neurons in vivo can control spike frequency parametrically and, surprisingly, can even bias the animal's behavioral response. Here, we extend this stimulation protocol to time-dependent broadband noise stimulation in sensory and motor cortices of rat. In response to such stimuli, we found increased temporal spike-time reliability. The information transmission properties reveal, both experimentally and theoretically, that the neurons support high-frequency stimulation beyond the inverse membrane time. Generating a stimulus using the neuron's response properties, we could evoke prescribed spike times with high precision. Our work helps to establish a novel method for precise temporal control of single-cell spiking and provides a simplified biophysical description of single-neuron spiking under time-dependent in vivo-like stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.