Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798177›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Synaptic Contributions to Receptive Field Structure and Response Properties in the Rodent Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Thalamus.

Vandana Suresh, Ulaş M Çiftçioğlu, Xin Wang, Brittany M Lala, Kimberly R Ding, William A Smith, Friedrich T Sommer, Judith A Hirsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Acute Visual Experience on Development of LGN Receptive Fields in the Ferret.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Visual Information Processing in the Ventral Division of the Mouse Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Orientation-Selective Retinal Circuits in Vertebrates.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vandana SureshDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520.
Ulaş M ÇiftçioğluDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520.
Xin WangComputational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, and.
Brittany M LalaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520.
Kimberly R DingDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520.
William A SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520.
Friedrich T SommerRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3198.
Judith A HirschDepartment of Biological Sciences and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520, jhirsch@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Neural Circuits That Process Visual InformationR01EY009593 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Judith A Hirsch · 1999 to 2026
$9.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative physiological and anatomical studies have greatly advanced our understanding of sensory systems. Many lines of evidence show that the murine lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) has unique attributes, compared with other species such as cat and monkey. For example, in rodent, thalamic receptive field structure is markedly diverse, and many cells are sensitive to stimulus orientation and direction. To explore shared and different strategies of synaptic integration across species, we made whole-cell recordings in vivo from the murine LGN during the presentation of visual stimuli, analyzed the results with different computational approaches, and compared our findings with those from cat. As for carnivores, murine cells with classical center-surround receptive fields had a "push-pull" structure of excitation and inhibition within a given On or Off subregion. These cells compose the largest single population in the murine LGN (∼40%), indicating that push-pull is key in the form vision pathway across species. For two cell types with overlapping On and Off responses, which recalled either W3 or suppressed-by-contrast ganglion cells in murine retina, inhibition took a different form and was most pronounced for spatially extensive stimuli. Other On-Off cells were selective for stimulus orientation and direction. In these cases, retinal inputs were tuned and, for oriented cells, the second-order subunit of the receptive field predicted the preferred angle. By contrast, suppression was not tuned and appeared to sharpen stimulus selectivity. Together, our results provide new perspectives on the role of excitation and inhibition in retinothalamic processing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We explored the murine lateral geniculate nucleus from a comparative physiological perspective. In cat, most retinal cells have center-surround receptive fields and push-pull excitation and inhibition, including neurons with the smallest (highest acuity) receptive fields. The same is true for thalamic relay cells. In mouse retina, the most numerous cell type has the smallest receptive fields but lacks push-pull. The most common receptive field in rodent thalamus, however, is center-surround with push-pull. Thus, receptive field structure supersedes size per se for form vision. Further, for many orientation-selective cells, the second-order component of the receptive field aligned with stimulus preference, whereas suppression was untuned. Thus, inhibition may improve spatial resolution and sharpen other forms of selectivity in rodent lateral geniculate nucleus.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCatsFemaleGeniculate BodiesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural InhibitionRatsRats, Long-EvansRetinal Ganglion CellsSpecies SpecificitySynapsesinhibitionin vivoLGNrelay cellwhole-cell

Identifiers

PMID27798177
PMCPMC5098835
OpenAlexW2543872624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.